De Santanna v. O'Malley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

De Santanna v. O'Malley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1621

RODRIGUEZ SAMUEL DA MATHA DE SANTANNA,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor (first Representative of Maryland); GLENN IVEY, State’s Attorney (first Public Prosecutor of PG County); BRIAN LOFTON, Commissioner (ID#5138),

Defendants – Appellees,

and

STATE OF MARYLAND, In care of Governor O’Malley,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv—01927-AW)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santana, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santana appeals the

district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to

dismiss in this civil rights action. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. De Matha De

Santana v. O’Malley, No. 8:09-cv-01927-AW (D. Md. filed

May 21, 2010 & entered May 24, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished