Sekoh v. Sekoh

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sekoh v. Sekoh

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1941

DANNY JAN SEKOH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

LINDA STRICKLEN SEKOH; SHANNON POORE,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00251-D)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Jan Sekoh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Danny Jan Sekoh appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Sekoh v. Sekoh, No. 5:10-cv-00251-D

(E.D.N.C. July 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished