Achoronye v. Prince George's County
Achoronye v. Prince George's County
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1315
ANTHONY ACHORONYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02528-RWT)
Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Achoronye, Appellant Pro Se. Rajeshanand Kumar, Maria Katherine Patterson, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM Anthony Achoronye appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court from the bench. Achoronye v. Prince George’s Cnty., No. 8:09-cv-02528-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.