U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Russell v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Russell v. Commonwealth of Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 2010

Russell v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1415

JOSEPH M. RUSSELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III; D. ARTHUR KELSEY; WILLIAM G. PETTY; M. LANGHORNE KEITH, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:09-cv-00029-JBF-DEM)

Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph M. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Monolo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joseph M. Russell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. Virginia, No. 4:09-cv-00029-JBF-DEM (E.D. Va. March 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.