U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Taccino v. Homeq Servicing

Taccino v. Homeq Servicing
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 26, 2010

Taccino v. Homeq Servicing

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1260

WILLIAM A. TACCINO; MARLENE M. TACCINO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. HOMEQ SERVICING; MANCINI & ASSOCIATES; U.S. BANK N/A; MORRIS SCHNEIDER PRYOR JOHNSON & FREEDMAN, LLC; G. DOUGLAS REINHARD; RICK CONNER; EXPRESS MORTGAGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00185-JPB)

Submitted: September 16, 2010 Decided: October 26, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Taccino, Marlene M. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Wendy Anne Owens, LAW OFFICE OF WENDY A. OWENS, PC, Savannah, Georgia; Marshall Howard Ross, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Jason Patrick Foster, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Homeq Serv., No. 3:08-cv-00185-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Feb. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.