U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Oxendine

United States v. Oxendine
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 28, 2010

United States v. Oxendine

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6864

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL OXENDINE, a/k/a Hollywood, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00811-TLW-5)

Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 28, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Oxendine, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Oxendine appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Oxendine, No. 4:04-cr-00811-TLW-5 (D.S.C. May 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.