Pridgen v. Department of Public Works

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Pridgen v. Department of Public Works

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2385

PHILLIP M. PRIDGEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Bureau of Highways; EDWARD C. ADAMS, JR., Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways; ROBERT BURGESS, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways; TOM SHUMAKER, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways; RICK RICHARDS, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways; GEORGE GAY, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways; THERESA S. HILL, Baltimore County Human Resources; RANDY SHIFFLETT; JAMES T. SMITH, County Executive, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-02826-WDO)

Submitted: October 21, 2010 Decided: November 15, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip M. Pridgen, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Grant Cook, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Phillip M. Pridgen appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pridgen

v. Dep’t of Pub. Works, No. 1:08-cv-02826-WDO (D. Md. Dec. 1,

2009). We deny Pridgen’s motion for appointment of counsel as

moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished