Kant v. Cohen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kant v. Cohen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1054

CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

JAY L. COHEN,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08- cv-00318-RWT)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: November 22, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Deborah Murrell Whelihan, JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district

court’s orders granting the Defendant’s motion for summary

judgment and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Kant v. Cohen, No. 8:08-cv-00318-RWT (D. Md. Dec. 11, 2009; Oct.

14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished