UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6630

VINCENT MISSOURI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MARK C. MOORE; DEBORAH B. BARBIER, Assistant US Attorney; UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT; DICKIE BRUNSON, Chief US Probation Officer; MYRA E. BAILEY, Supervising US Probation Officer; EARL GILLAM, US Probation Officer; US FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE; UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE, Greenville Division; GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINA SHERIFFS OFFICE, STATE OF; JUSTIN HUGHES, Officer, all Defendants officially and individually; HONORABLE MARGARET B. SEYMOUR; US BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNICOR PRISON INDUSTRY; DAVID PLOWDEN; CATHERINE E. EVATT; UNITED STATES MARSHAL’S SERVICE, Columbia Division,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (2:09-cv-03269-CMC)

Submitted: November 10, 2010 Decided: November 23, 2010

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent Missouri, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Vincent Missouri appeals the district court’s order

denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion to

alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Missouri v. United States, No.

2:09-cv-03269-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2010). To the extent

Missouri requests in his informal brief to waive the appellate

case filing fee and to amend his complaint, we deny those

requests. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3