Sindram v. Robelen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sindram v. Robelen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1928

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 24, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order

denying as frivolous his motion seeking leave to proceed in

forma pauperis on appeal in No. 10-1374. The denial of in forma

pauperis status is immediately appealable. Roberts v. United

States Dist. Ct.,

339 U.S. 844, 845

(1950) (per curiam). We

have reviewed the record and conclude the appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Sindram v. Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-

IDD (E.D. Va. filed July 14, 2010 & entered July 15, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished