Knight v. Episcopal Church of the US
Knight v. Episcopal Church of the US
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1947
MILDRED C. KNIGHT; BOBBY KNIGHT, III,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE UNITED STATES; BISHOP KATHARINE JEFFERTS SCHORI; EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF LOWER SOUTH CAROLINA; REVEREND MARK J. LAWRENCE; EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME; FAMILY SERVICES INCORPORATED; IRIS ALBRIGHT; IRVIN CONDON; WALTER KAUFFMAN; GLENN CHURCHILL; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES; LINDA K. JONES; C. CHLOE; FREDERICK R. TONNEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00516-DCN)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 24, 2010
Before AGEE, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mildred C. Knight, Bobby Knight, III, Appellants Pro Se.
* The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d) Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Mildred C. Knight and Bobby Knight, III, appeal the
district court’s orders denying their motion to reconsider the
order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
and dismissing their purported civil rights action for lack of
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United
States, No. 2:10-cv-00516-DCN (D.S.C. July 26, 2010 & Aug. 10,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished