Knight v. Episcopal Church of the US

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Knight v. Episcopal Church of the US

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1947

MILDRED C. KNIGHT; BOBBY KNIGHT, III,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE UNITED STATES; BISHOP KATHARINE JEFFERTS SCHORI; EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF LOWER SOUTH CAROLINA; REVEREND MARK J. LAWRENCE; EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME; FAMILY SERVICES INCORPORATED; IRIS ALBRIGHT; IRVIN CONDON; WALTER KAUFFMAN; GLENN CHURCHILL; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES; LINDA K. JONES; C. CHLOE; FREDERICK R. TONNEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00516-DCN)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 24, 2010

Before AGEE, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. *

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mildred C. Knight, Bobby Knight, III, Appellants Pro Se.

* The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 46

(d) Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Mildred C. Knight and Bobby Knight, III, appeal the

district court’s orders denying their motion to reconsider the

order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

and dismissing their purported civil rights action for lack of

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United

States, No. 2:10-cv-00516-DCN (D.S.C. July 26, 2010 & Aug. 10,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished