United States v. Hunt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hunt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6926

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEANGELO HUNT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cr-00316-RLW-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 1, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deangelo Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Everett James, Jr., Chief Deputy Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Deangelo Hunt appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for resentencing in light of legislation

regarding the mandatory penalties for crack cocaine that was

pending at the time his motion was filed. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Hunt, No. 3:06-cr-00316-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished