U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Dale v. Forsythe

Dale v. Forsythe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 2, 2010

Dale v. Forsythe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7294

ROHAJI D. DALE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LANCE P. FORSYTHE, Superintendant; DOCTOR OFOGH, Doctor; GENE JOHNSON, Director of Prisons; CHRISTY GRAY, LPN Nurse; ERICA POWELL, EMT Worker; C. E. DAVIS, Warden; DR. M.

MILITANA, Doctor; DOCTOR HERCULES, Doctor, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00624-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rohaji D. Dale, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lloyd Lee Byrd, Ruth Griggs, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Rohaji Dale appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dale v. Forsythe, No. 2:09-cv-00624-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.