In re: Daniels

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Daniels

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1459

In Re: JIMMIE CRAIG DANIELS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:07-cr-00341-RBH-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmie Craig Daniels, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jimmie Craig Daniels petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2010) motion. He seeks an order

from this court directing the district court to act. Our review

of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court

has denied Daniels’ § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the

district court has recently decided Daniels’ case, we deny the

mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and deny Daniels’ motion for release. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished