Boldin v. Wingfield
Boldin v. Wingfield
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2089
DONNA FOX BOLDIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALISON WINGFIELD; CECILEY HUSELIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:10-cv-00010-nkm-mfu)
Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donna Fox Boldin, Appellant Pro Se. Sherwood Sunderland Day, DAY & CURRENT LAW OFFICES, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Donna Fox Boldin appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Boldin v. Wingfield, No.
6:10-cv-00010-nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished