Gould v. City of Newport News, Virginia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Gould v. City of Newport News, Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6893

KELVIN GOULD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA; ARTISHA K. TODD, Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney for the City of Newport News, VA; CHARLES E. HADEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00286-JBF-FBS)

Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelvin Gould, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Gould appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Gould v. City of Newport News, No. 2:10-

cv-00286-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. June 23, 2010). We deny Gould’s

motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished