U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Maddox v. Johnson

Maddox v. Johnson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 10, 2010

Maddox v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7081

MELVIN COREY MADDOX, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GENE M. JOHNSON; FRED SHILLING; TRACY S. RAY; M. COLLINS; L. MULLINS; B. OWENS; V. PHIPPS; STANLEY; H. SMITH; R. KILGORE; S. CHURCH; L. YATES; T. MCCOY; A. MULLINS; J.

RASNICK; GARRY KENDRICK, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cv-00179-GEC-MFU)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 10, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Corey Maddox, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Melvin Corey Maddox appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maddox v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00179-GEC-MFU (W.D. Va. July 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.