Wilson v. C/O Roberts

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wilson v. C/O Roberts

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6949

FRED LEWIS WILSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

C/O ROBERTS; C/O TABOR; SGT. ELY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

B. COLLINS, SGT.; M. WILLIAMS, C/O; H. BISHOP, C/O; J. DURHAM, C/O; SGT. KING; LT. KILBOURNE; C/O HYLTON; C/O BOYD; TED THOMPSON, DR.; M. STANFORD, RN; MELISSA SPEARS, LPN; PATSY GARNETTE ZEPPA, RN; PATRICIA HILLMAN, RN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00638-gec-mfu)

Submitted: December 6, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Fred Lewis Wilson appeals the district court’s

judgment entered after a jury found in favor of Appellees and

denied relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record, conclude that the issues Wilson raises do

not present substantial questions, and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we decline to authorize preparation of the trial

transcript at government expense and affirm the judgment of the

district court. We grant Wilson’s motion to withdraw his

September 2010 motion for production of documents and deny

Wilson’s October 2010 motion for production of documents. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished