Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Jay H. Lee, Charly J. Lee, and Julie R. Lee (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their civil complaint and outstanding motions alleging housing discrimination by federal, state, and local agencies and their respective employees. * The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2010). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellants that failure to file timely specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. *690 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Appellants have waived appellate review by failing to properly file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We grant the Lees’ motion for access to the restricted access document filed by them and deny their motions to seal and for mandamus.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.