Hatch v. Gutierrez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hatch v. Gutierrez, 400 F. App'x 773 (4th Cir. 2010)

Hatch v. Gutierrez

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Hatch appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying *774relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hatch v. Gutierrez, No. 2:07-cv-00104-REM-JSK, 2009 WL 361199 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Richard HATCH, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Dominic A. GUTIERREZ, Sr. Wayne Phillips, Warden Lewis Brescoach, Health Services Administrator Veronica Fernandez, Case Management Coordinator Daniel J. Hickey, DMD, Chief Dental Officer Renee Crogan, Assistant Health Administrator, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published