U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Coil v. Peterkin

Coil v. Peterkin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 12, 2010 · Davis, Hamilton, Niemeyer
401 F. App'x 773

Counsel

Samuel L. Coil, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Coil v. Peterkin

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel L. Coil appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coil v. Peterkin, No. 1:07-cv-00145-WO-WWD, 2009 WL 3247848 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2009). We deny Coil’s motions for appointment of counsel and for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.