Pridgen v. Department of Public Works, Bureau of Highways
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Phillip M. Pridgen appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pridgen v. Dep’t of Pub. Works, No. 1:08-cv-02826-WDO, 2009 WL 4726619 (D.Md. Dec. 1, 2009). We deny Pridgen’s motion for appointment of counsel as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Phillip M. PRIDGEN v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS Edward C. Adams, Jr., Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways Robert Burgess, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways Tom Shumaker, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways Rick Richards, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways George Gay, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways Theresa S. Hill, Baltimore County Human Resources Randy Shifflett James T. Smith, County Executive, Department of Public Works/Bureau of Highways, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Published