Missouri v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Vincent Missouri appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Missouri v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-03269-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2010). To the extent Missouri requests in his informal brief to waive the appellate case filing fee and to amend his complaint, we deny those requests. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Vincent MISSOURI v. UNITED STATES of America Mark C. Moore Deborah B. Barbier, Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Probation Department Dickie Brunson, Chief U.S. Probation Officer Myra E. Bailey, Supervising US Probation Officer Earl Gillam, US Probation Officer US Federal Public Defenders Office United States Marshall Service, Greenville Division Greenville South Carolina Sheriffs Office, State of Justin Hughes, Officer, all officially and individually Honorable Margaret B. Seymour US Bureau of Prisons Unicor Prison Industry David Plowden Catherine E. Evatt United States Marshal's Service, Columbia Division
- Status
- Published