Cherry v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Grady v. Cathey (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2024)
- Carmona v. Adona Medical Health Care Provider (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2023)
- St. Clair v. Navy Federal Credit Union (District Court, D. Maryland 2022)
- Grady v. Rogers (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2022)
- Grady v. Boitnott (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2022)
- Sapp v. McFadden (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2022)
- Sapp v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2022)
- Sapp v. Audi of Charlotte (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2022)
- Harris v. Department of Health and Human Services (District Court, D. Maryland 2021)
- Benjamin v. Sparks (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kelly Monique Cherry, Christopher Ingram, Jermaine Phillipe Mack, and Winifred Devon Sweeney appeal the district court’s order and judgment granting United Parcel Service, Inc.’s summary judgment motions on their North Carolina state law claims for defamation, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and willful or wanton conduct. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Cherry v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. 5:07-cv-00403-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.