Simpson v. Kapeluck

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Simpson v. Kapeluck, 402 F. App'x 803 (4th Cir. 2010)

Simpson v. Kapeluck

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cory Anthony Simpson appeals the district court’s order declining to accept the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to prosecute, and granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the merits of the action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *804error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simpson v. Kapeluck, No. 2:09-cv-00021, 2010 WL 1981099 (S.D.W.Va. May 14, 2010). We further deny Simpson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Cory Anthony SIMPSON, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Officer KAPELUCK C.J. Howell, Officer, Defendants—Appellees
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published