U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Simpson v. Kapeluck

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 30, 2010 · Agee, Hamilton, Shedd

402 F. App'x 803

Counsel

Cory Anthony Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Deering Mullins, Steptoe & Johnson, L.L.P., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Kuhn v. Casto (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2023)
Fair American Insurance and Reinsurance Company v. Capitol Valley Contracting, Inc. (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cory Anthony Simpson appeals the district court’s order declining to accept the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to prosecute, and granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the merits of the action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *804error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simpson v. Kapeluck, No. 2:09-cv-00021, 2010 WL 1981099 (S.D.W.Va. May 14, 2010). We further deny Simpson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.