Sweat v. Cook

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 30, 2010

Sweat v. Cook, 402 F. App'x 807 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweat v. Cook, No. 9:09-cv-01255-HFF, 2010 WL 1444190 (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2010). *808We deny Sweat’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Reginald C. SWEAT v. Dorris COOK, Head Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity Harry McKenn, Dr., Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published