Maddox v. Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 10, 2010

Maddox v. Johnson, 404 F. App'x 750 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Corey Maddox appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maddox v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00179-GEC-MFU (W.D.Va. July 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Melvin Corey MADDOX v. Gene M. JOHNSON Fred Shilling Tracy S. Ray M. Collins L. Mullins B. Owens V. Phipps Stanley H. Smith R. Kilgore S. Church L. Yates T. McCoy A. Mullins J. Rasnick Garry Kendrick
Status: Published