U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Nicholson v. Daniels

Nicholson v. Daniels
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2010 · Davis, Duncan, Gregory
405 F. App'x 801

Counsel

Winfred F. Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Steven Wesley Parks, Rachel Ida Wollitzer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Nicholson v. Daniels

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Winfred F. Nicholson appeals the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), his complaint in which he challenged the validity of the federal income tax statutes and the Internal Revenue Service’s levies to collect his income tax liabilities. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nicholson v. Daniels, No. 1:10-cv-00168-CMHTCB (E.D. Va. filed July 12, 2010; entered July 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.