Marte v. Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 30, 2010

Marte v. Maryland, 406 F. App'x 740 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francisco Marte appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Marte v. State of Maryland, No. 1:08-CV-03309-WMN, 2010 WL 1427411 (D.Md. Apr. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Francisco MARTE v. State of MARYLAND Nancy Kopp, Honorable, Treasurer of the State of Maryland Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland Gary D. Maynard, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services J. Michael Stouffer, Commissioner Division of Correction, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services William Blackiston, Warden, Division of Correction, Eastern Pre-Release Unit Scott Oakley, Esq., Executive Director, Inmate Grievance Office XYZ, or \John Doe\" Corp."
Status: Published