U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Burke v. Judge

Burke v. Judge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 29, 2010 · Agee, Hamilton, Shedd
408 F. App'x 646

Counsel

Peter Burke, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Louis Phillip Hornthal, III, Hornthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland, LLP, Elizabeth City, North Cax-olina; Craig Douglas Cannon, James R. Morgan, Jr., Womble, Carlyle, Sandx’idge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Walter Gx’egory Merritt, Jay C. Salsman, Harris, Creech, Ward & Blackerby, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Burke v. Judge

Opinion of the Court

Affix-med by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions ax-e not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter Burke, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burke v. Owens, No. 5:07-ct-03162-FL (W.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.