U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Foster v. Drew

Foster v. Drew
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 11, 2010 · Agee, Hamilton, Niemeyer
360 F. App'x 446

Counsel

Bobby O. Foster, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Foster v. Drew

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby O. Foster, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foster v. Drew, No. 3:09-cv-00118-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2009). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *447materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.