Fox v. Drew

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Fox v. Drew, 361 F. App'x 495 (4th Cir. 2010)

Fox v. Drew

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fox v. Drew, No. 2:09-cv-01868-*496HFF, 2009 WL 2381304 (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Clarence T. FOX, Jr. v. Darlene DREW, Warden
Status
Published