Mendez v. Britt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Mendez v. Britt, 361 F. App'x 502 (4th Cir. 2010)

Mendez v. Britt

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his *503complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We also deny the motion to “notice of error”. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Raphael MENDEZ, Plaintiff—Appellant v. W. Earl BRITT, Federal Judge James B. Craven, III, Federal Appointed Counsel Alan DuBois, Federal Appointed Attorney Jane E. Pearce, Federal Appointed Attorney, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published