City of Durham v. Wadsworth

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
City of Durham v. Wadsworth, 362 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2010)

City of Durham v. Wadsworth

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Iris Wadsworth and Emmett W. Caldwell appeal the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order denying their motion for an extension of time within which to file objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
CITY OF DURHAM County of Durham, Political subdivisions of the State of North Carolina v. Iris WADSWORTH Emmett W. Caldwell
Status
Published