U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Hickman v. McDonnell

Hickman v. McDonnell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 2, 2010 · Duncan, Niemeyer, Shedd
363 F. App'x 281

Hickman v. McDonnell

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chester L. Hickman, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hickman v. McDonnell, No. 2:09-ev-00163-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *282and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.