U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Hunt v. Sandhir

Hunt v. Sandhir
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 9, 2010 · Davis, Shedd, Wilkinson
364 F. App'x 811

Hunt v. Sandhir

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roy Hunt, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunt v. Sandhir, No. 3:06-cv-00539-RLW (E.D.Va. June 30, 2009). We deny Hunt’s motions for appointment of counsel and summary disposition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.