Everson v. Doughton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Everson v. Doughton, 366 F. App'x 461 (4th Cir. 2010)

Everson v. Doughton

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David K. and Patricia M. Everson appeal the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action, denying their motion for recusal, and issuing a pre-filing injunction against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in both its orders, as well as the judgment, dated July 15, 2009. Everson v. Doughton, No. 1:08— cv-00887-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
David K. EVERSON Patricia M. Everson, Plaintiffs—Appellants v. Richard L. DOUGHTON, Individually and In His Official Capacity as Justice of the Superior Court of Alleghany/Rockingham County, North Carolina, Defendant—Appellee
Status
Published