U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Vargas

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2010 · King, Michael, Wilkinson

367 F. App'x 406

Counsel

Hector Vargas, Appellant pro se. J. Frank Bradsher, Office of the United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renter, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hector Vargas appeals the district court’s oi’der denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vargas, No. 7:01-cr-00096-BR-l (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.