Richardson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 25, 2010

Richardson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 367 F. App'x 408 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 4:08-cv-2596-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Curtis Dale RICHARDSON, Plaintiff—Appellant v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Willie Eagleton, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, Individual and official capacity HIPP, Lieutenant, Individual and official capacity Evans Control Transportation and Classification Department Personnel, Individual and official capacities, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published