U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2010 · King, Michael, Wilkinson
367 F. App'x 408

Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alphonso Haynesworth appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haynesworth v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:08-cv-01841-PMD, 2009 WL 3233470 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.