Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Alphonso Haynesworth appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haynesworth v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:08-cv-01841-PMD, 2009 WL 3233470 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Alphonso HAYNESWORTH, Plaintiff—Appellant v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Jon Ozmint, Director of SCDC Warden Bob Anderson Associate Warden NFN Brillford Major NFN Murray Captain Edward Bittinger Lieutenant NFN Brachel Sergeant NFN Ferguson Officer NFN Foreman Sergeant NFN Hoosier Ms. NFN Hunter Officer Jenkins Officer Jones Dho S. Patterson Ms. NFN Hunter, Law Librarian Officer NFN Staats Officer NFN Uptergraff Mr. NFN Stevenson, Classification Captain B. Hinger Officer Uptagraft, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Published