Rochester v. Seneca Town & Insurance
Rochester v. Seneca Town & Insurance
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for declaratory judgment and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rochester v. Seneca Town & Ins. Co., No. 2:08-cv-03417-HMH-RSC (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.