U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Rochester v. Seneca Town & Insurance

Rochester v. Seneca Town & Insurance
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2010 · Duncan, Michael, Wilkinson
367 F. App'x 438

Rochester v. Seneca Town & Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for declaratory judgment and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rochester v. Seneca Town & Ins. Co., No. 2:08-cv-03417-HMH-RSC (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal *439contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.