U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Reese

United States v. Reese
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2010 · King, Michael, Wilkinson
367 F. App'x 475

Counsel

Curtis Antonio Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Reese

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Antonio Reese appeals the district court’s order denying Reese’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reese, No. 3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.