U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Reese

United States v. Reese
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2010 · King, Michael, Wilkinson
367 F. App'x 475

United States v. Reese

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Antonio Reese appeals the district court’s order denying Reese’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reese, No. 3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.