U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Scott

United States v. Scott
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2010 · Agee, Duncan, Hamilton
368 F. App'x 347

United States v. Scott

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Scott appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gregory, No 5:97-cr-00133-H-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.