U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Moment v. O'Malley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2010 · Agee, Duncan, Hamilton

368 F. App'x 359

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Moment appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moment v. O’Malley, No. 8:09-cv-02209-AW (D.Md. filed Sept. 16, 2009; entered Sept. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.