U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Dutton v. Montgomery County Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2010 · Agee, Duncan, Hamilton

368 F. App'x 362

Counsel

Edward L. Dutton, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via, Chief, Edward Barry Lattner, County Attorney’s Office, Rockville, Maryland; Danielle E. Marone, Jo Anna Schmidt, Schmidt, Dailey & O’Neill, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland; James F. Shalleck, Montgomery, Maryland; Lindsay Nichole Warnes, Rockville, Maryland; Jessica Lynn Ellsworth, Steven Paul Hollman, Hogan & Harson, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward L. Dutton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dutton v. Montgomery County Maryland, No. 8:08-cv-03504-DKC, 2009 WL 2496844 (D.Md. Aug. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.