U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Darity

United States v. Darity
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 3, 2010 · Agee, Duncan, Hamilton
368 F. App'x 378

Counsel

Michael Leroy Darity, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Darity

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Leroy Darity appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Darity, No. 1:95-cr-00132-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. July 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argu*379ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.