U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Copeland

United States v. Copeland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 3, 2010 · Michael, Motz, Wilkinson
368 F. App'x 461

Counsel

Cleveland Darnell Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

United States v. Copeland

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cleveland Darnell Copeland appeals the district court’s denial of his motions for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Copeland, No. 8:00-cr-00424-PJM-15 (D.Md. Aug. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.