U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Richardson v. Geren

Richardson v. Geren
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2010 · Davis, Motz, Niemeyer
370 F. App'x 385

Richardson v. Geren

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny D. Richardson appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion to dismiss Richardson’s complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Geren, No. 1:08-cv-03121-CCB (D.Md. May 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.