U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Sanders

United States v. Sanders
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 22, 2010 · Davis, Motz, Niemeyer
371 F. App'x 366

United States v. Sanders

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Breon Montez Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. *367§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sanders’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanders, No. 5:05-cr-00026-F-2 (E.D.N.C. July 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.